Detection responsibility
1. Assess the risk of misstatement
ongoing process, every phase of an audit
2. Design audit to provide reasonable assurance of detection of material misstatement
3. Excercise due care / evaluating results
exercise due care, the proper degree of professional skepticism(questioning mind/ critical assessment)
* professional skepticism
- design additional auditing procedures to obtain more reliable evidence
- obtaining corroboration of mgt explanation through consultation with a specialist
- 3rd P confirmation
Reporting Responsibility
1. modify departure from GAAP
2. report to audit committee
3. GAGAS, consider other parties
Fraud
type
a. Fraudulent financial reporting(mgt fraud)
b. Misappropriation of assets
factor
inventive/ pressure: reasons to provided to commit the misrepresentation. when mgt is under pressure, from sources outside or inside the entity to achieve financial outcome. individual may have an incentive to misappropriate assets.
- downgrading by credit rating agency
- new accounting regulatory requirements: misstatements from fraudulent FR
- promotions, compensation inconsistent with expectation: misappropriation of assets
opportunity: a circumstance that allows a misrepresentation to occur. individual believes IC can be overridden, easy to steal asset. ineffective IC, override of controls, control이 없거나 무너져서 기회가 생기는것
- unusual related P T: misstatements from fraudulent FR
- significant bank accounts in tax-haven jurisdictions, no clear biz justification: misstatements from fraudulent FR
- ineffective board of directors or audit committee oversight over IC: misstatements from fraudulent FR
- Large amounts of cash on hand or processed: misappropriation of assets
- Lack of independent check: misappropriation of assets
- fixed assets lack owenership identification
attitude/ rationalization: attitude> EE creates a mindset that justifies the misrepresentation, mgt's disregard for controls, or mgt overly aggressive attitude in meeting financial goals
- Excessive int by mgt in maintaining or increasing the entity's stock price: misstatements from FR
- failure of mgt to correct known deficiencies > mgt disregards controls: misstatements from FR
procedure
1) staff discussion: consider fraud risk factors, professional skepticism
2) obtain info: inquiries, analytical procedure
3) Identify risk: type, significance, Likelihood, pervasiveness
4) Assess the identified risk
5) Respond to the results of the assessment
* if risk increases
- overall: more experienced staff, attention to significant accounting policies, less predictable procedure
- specifically ided risk: increase NTE
- mgt override: examine adj JE, accounting estimate for biases, significant unusual transaction
6) Evaluate audit evidence
- lost of document > heighten risk of fraud
ex) photocopy of vendor's invoice, lost documents for asset addition
7) Communicate about fraud
mgt: all fraud
audit committee: material fraud & mgt fraud
information users: modification of opinion
8) Document consideration of fraud
* no remedial action > withdraw
Illegal acts
Direct effect on FS | Indirect effect on FS |
Design audit to reasonable assurance of MM | If specific info come sto attention> apply audit procedure |
small illegal acts misstatement, may material effect on entire FS
possibility of illegal acts
- unauthorized, improperly recorded, or unrecorded T
- investigation by the government
* if risk increases
1) inquire mgt at the level above > consult with client's legal counsel or other specialists, apply additional procedures
2) Consider the FS effect
'회계 세무 공부 > AICPA 공부 요약' 카테고리의 다른 글
[AUD] Quality Control (0) | 2024.03.03 |
---|---|
[AUD] Using the work of others (0) | 2024.03.02 |
[AUD] Audit Risk, Sampling Risk, Materiality (0) | 2024.02.29 |
[AUD] Attestation Standards, SSAE (0) | 2024.02.26 |
[AUD] Internal Control (IC TOC vs FS TOC) integrate audit (0) | 2024.02.26 |
댓글