Creation of Agency relationship
- writing is generally not required to create an agency relationship
- consideration is not required to form an agency relationship,
* but consideration is required for a legally enforceable agreement
Principal: Hires the agent to act on their behalf - cannot be a minor - cannot be mentally incompetent Agent: Negotiates with third parties on behalf of the principal |
writing is required under the following circumstances
1) Marriage
2) A writing must evidence agency agreement of more than a Year
3) to buy or sell an interest in Land for the principal
4) contracts by Executors to pay estate debts out of personal funds
5) sale of goods for $500 or more
6) contract to act as surety
Power of attorney
- written authorization of an agency(attorney in fact)
- need not be a lawyer. the agent has the power to act on behalf of the principal
- principal is required to sign the power of attorney
- may limit the agency's authority to specific trasactions
Duties of an Agent to the Principal
Key Fiduciary Duties: the agent has whatever duties that are expressly stated in the contract
1) Duty of Loyalty - no self-dealing, no competing, no kickbacks 2) Duty of Obedience - agent must obey all reasonable directions of the principal whether oral or written 3) Duty of Reasonable care 4) Duty to Account - an agent cannot blend the principal's property with the agent's property |
- Hiring a subagent
subagent owes a duty of care to both the agent and the principal
Principal's remedies
Tort Damages: sue and recover damages from the agent for committing the wrongful act
* An employer may be liable for a tort committed by an EE within the scope of empolyment
Contract Damages
sue for tort damages | sue for contract damages | |
agent is receiving compensation | yes | yes |
agent is not receiving compensation * still has duty to indemnify(실비정산) unless parties have agreed otherwise |
yes | no |
Recovery of secret profits(commission form third party or kickbacks)
Withhold compensation
Duties of principal to agent_Imjplied by law
Compensation
Reimbursement/Indemnification
Remedies of the Agent
When the principal breaches his or her duties
Power to terminate relationship vs Right to terminate relationship
the agency relationship is consensual, either party generally has the power to terminate the relationship at any time
but not have right to terminate at any time
Agency coupled with an int, principal does not have the power or the right to terminate the agency, only the agent can
* Death, incapacity, bankruptcy of the principal will not end an agency coupled with an interest
Actual Authority
agent's power to contractually bind principal
1) actual authority: agent has the power and the right to bind the principal to contracts with third parities ex) O, hire/fire employees, purchase inventory, pay business debts X, sell mortage business fixture, other property of the principal, borrow money on the principal's behalf 2) apparent authority or estoppel: agent has power but not the right 3) Ratification: Agent has no power or right, but the principal chooses to be bound by an unauthorized act |
Termination of actual authority
- Agent quits or gets fired
- Accomplishment of objective or expiration of a stated period
- Automatic termination of actual authority(by operation of law)
1) Bankruptcy of the principal
2) Incapacity of the principal
3) Death of either the principal or the agent
4) Failure to acquire a necessary license
5) Subsequent illegality
6) Destruction of the subject matter of the agency
Apparent Authority
Apparent authority 3rd party's reasonable belief that the agent has the power to bind the principal |
Actual Authority agent's reasonable belief that the agent has the power to bind the principal |
General agent series of transactions involving a continuity of service ex) store manager, president, CEO |
special agent perform one or more transactions not involving continuity of service ex) realtor |
- the agent will continue to have apparent authority until the principal notifies third parties
- actual notice must be given to terminate apparent authority to old or current customers
- constructive notice( ad in the newspaper or trade magazine)
Ratification
allows a principal to choose to become bound by a previously unauthorized act of his or her agent
- agent cannot give themselves apparent authority
- principal must ratify the entire transaction, there can be no partial ratification
- ratification does not require consideration and the principal need not notify the third party of the ratification
- only the purported/disclosed principal may ratify
Contractual Liability
Principal liable if the agent had authority or the principal ratified
actual authority apparent authority ratified the transaction |
principal's liability does not depend on whether the principal's existence or identity was disclosed
Agent's liability to 3rd parties for the contract duties
Disclosed principal |
agent discloses the existence and identity of the principal, the 3d party cannot hold an authorized agent liable for the contract |
Unidentified and undisclosed principal(agent liable) |
- agent is liable on the contact with the third party - 3rd party can hold either the principal or the agent(not both) liable - no apparent authority with an undisclosed principal - principal cannot ratify contracts unless they are disclosed |
- The principal is bound if the agent has authority (actual or apparent). it is irrelevant whether the principal was disclosed, unidentified, or undisclosed. it the agent did not have authority, the principal is bound only if the agent did not have authority, the principal is bound only if he ratifies
- An agent is always liable to a third party for damages if the agent lies to the third party
3rd party's Liability to perform contract duties
- principal can hold the 3rd party liable on a contract, even if the principal's existence or identity were not disclosed
Tort liability
- general rule, a principal is not liable for the torts committed by his or her agent- only the agent is liable
- ER can be liable for an ee's torts committed within the scope of employment
Employer-Employee Relationship
EE - works full-time for the employer - uses the employer's facilities or tools - is compensated on a time basis - is subject to the supervision of the employer |
Independent contractor - has own business - own facilities and tools - hired for a particular job - paid a given amount for that job - follows own discretion in carrying out the job - responsible for his own torts |
Scope of Employment
ER liable- injury occurred within the scope of the employment, EE's negligence, * torts is authorized/ use of force is authorized (doctrine of respondeat superior)
- small detours from an employer's directions fall within the scope of the employment
'회계 세무 공부 > AICPA 공부 요약' 카테고리의 다른 글
[REG] Bankruptcy (0) | 2024.08.05 |
---|---|
[REG] Secured Transactions (0) | 2024.08.04 |
[REG] Delivery, risk of Loss and Title, Warranties (0) | 2024.08.04 |
[REG] Contracts (0) | 2024.08.03 |
[REG] Corporations (0) | 2024.07.27 |
댓글