[AUD] Using the work of others
0. Responsibility for opinion cannot be shared with others
1. Decide to use the work of others in the planning stage
2. Assess competence and objectivity
Internal auditor | Specialist(actuary) | |
Competence, Qualification |
- Quality of working paper documentation - external quality review of internal audit activities |
cerification, licences, reputation, experience |
Objectivity | - report to BOD, audit committee, general counsel - Professional internal auditing standards |
immair된경우 제한적으로 사용 * no relationship, greater assurance |
3. working with internal auditors
Although they can be involved with " test of controls" and " test of details", involvement should be limited to Less subjective area
1) understanding of internal control
use the internal auditor's documents regarding design and implementation
2) Risk assessment (TOC)
3) Substantive procedures
consider materiality, risk, and subjectivity of evidence
high risk of MM(professional judgment involved area): estimates, related p T, derivatives, fraud relate
low risk of MM(internal auditor may work alone): existence of cash, prepaid assets, fixed assets additions
4. working with specialists
Auditor should
review assumptions to evaluate the relevance, reliability, and adequacy of the work
* assumption> specialist's resp
required to understand the objectivity and nature & scope of the specialist's work
Work of specialist
unreasonable > additional procedure, another specialist
not support FS > the work reasonable > Q / A / UQ + E
> the work unreasonable > UQ
5. Component auditor
group auditor / component auditor
group auditor unable to review the component auditor's documentation > makes reference in the opinon
6. Another audit firm
when taking responsibility for the other firm's audit work
> review audit workpapers + reperform a subset of audit testing to validate the firm's conclusions